Is There A Place To Research Asbestos Litigation Online

Find an Asbestos Litigation Firm That Specializes in Mesothelioma For any legal case, it's best to work with a law firm that has expertise in the field you require assistance with. For instance, a lawyer who does nothing but car accidents won't be competent to handle mesothelioma lawsuits. Asbestos lawyers who specialize in mesothelioma litigation have the experience and expertise needed to win compensation for victims. They are also acquainted with the most recent laws and rulings in asbestos litigation. Levy Konigsberg LLP Levy Konigsberg LLP (LK) is a major asbestos litigation firm that has offices in New York and New Jersey. The firm's lawyers have secured multimillion dollar verdicts and settlements for victims of mesothelioma or asbestos cancer, as well as lead poisoning in New York, California, Georgia and across the country. The firm's lawyers are also experienced in handling cases involving medical negligence, product liability, and consumer fraud. In the last three decades, LK represented victims of asbestos-related diseases and mesothelioma. Their lawyers have won some of the largest jury verdicts for victims in the history of the world. The firm's mesothelioma lawyers have also been successful in prosecuting several notable lawsuits with regards to corporate misconduct and toxic exposure. The firm's lawyers have experience in pursuing litigation in different cases involving companies involved in the production and distribution of asbestos. This includes large corporations, such as major construction firms and real estate owners. Additionally, LK has successfully sued asbestos producers in lawsuits involving toxic exposure at military facilities and industrial manufacturing. In addition to representing asbestos victims, the firm also represents clients with other types of personal injury claims. This includes those who have been injured in car accidents, accidents, and medical malpractice. In some cases, the firm represents families who have lost loved ones due to medical negligence. Levy Konigsberg LLP attorneys have won many awards such as the Best Lawyer in America award for Personal Injury Lawyers as well as Super Lawyers for Plaintiff Personal Injury. U.S. News & World Report has also named them one of the most reputable mesothelioma law firms. In the last 30 years, LK has pursued justice for thousands of men and women who have been diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases. The majority of their clients are residents of the state of Maryland and other states across the United States. The patients were exposed to toxic substances and suffered serious health problems such as mesothelioma and lung cancer. Attorneys at LK have been granted licenses to practice law in New York, New Jersey and federal district courts throughout the 50 states. Individual attorneys are licensed to practice in other states according to their education and expertise in asbestos litigation. Waters Kraus & Paul If you or someone you know is diagnosed with Mesothelioma it is crucial to locate an attorney who can help you get the compensation you are due. Waters Kraus and Paul's mesothelioma attorneys have extensive experience and are committed to helping clients achieve the best possible results. They don't settle cases quickly and strive to obtain the most amount of compensation possible for their clients. The firm is a top law firm with offices in Dallas, Texas; Los Angeles, California; and Moline, Illinois. The firm's attorneys represent clients from all 50 states as well as numerous other countries. They have secured hundreds of millions in settlements and verdicts on behalf of their clients. They also dedicate themselves to defending asbestos victims' rights in asbestos litigation and have been a member of many advisory committees. Peter Kraus, a founding member of Waters Kraus & Paul, is a specialist in toxic torts as well as pharmaceutical injury and False Claims Act cases. He has tried to verdict numerous asbestos, benzene, and pharmaceutical cases in federal and state court across the country. This includes the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. He has also appeared before the Texas Legislature and Congress on behalf of asbestos victims. In the past asbestos plaintiffs' companies enlisted those suffering from asbestos-related illnesses and bundled them up to file lawsuits together. These tactics were designed to frighten the judiciary and make defendants rip off. But since the passage Senate Bill 15, this practice has largely stopped in Texas and across the United States. Peter Kraus believes that Garlock Sealing Technologies claims are absurd. Peter Kraus claims that Garlock's allegations are not true and that none of his clients have ever lied to Garlock. Waters Kraus & Paul lawyers believe that honesty is the best security for their clients and their families. Weitz & Luxenberg Mesothelioma patients need a firm with the resources, tenacity and expertise to get them fair compensation. Since its founding in 1986 the law firm of national size Weitz & Luxenberg helped asbestos victims receive billions of dollars in settlements and verdicts. Its litigation teams, which comprise more than 90 lawyers, are renowned for their innovative negotiation strategies and swift bargaining strategies. They will do whatever it takes to bring your case to a speedy and a satisfactory conclusion. Mesothelioma can be a devastating disease that can cause severe physical, emotional and financial burdens for the victims and their families. Exposure to asbestos is linked to the development of this cancer which can take years to manifest and kill. Many companies put profits over worker safety and do not reveal the dangers their products could pose. Workers who worked around asbestos or in asbestos are at a higher risk of developing asbestos-related illnesses like mesothelioma and lung cancer. Workers would often bring asbestos fibers home with them in their clothing or on their skin which they then passed on to family members. Asbestos-related victims can seek compensation for their illnesses from the companies responsible for their exposure. Weitz & Luxenberg has offices in New York and throughout the United States. The firm's lawyers have helped asbestos patients recover more than $17 billion in settlements and verdicts. Its attorneys are dedicated to making the process as easy and stress-free for mesothelioma victims as possible. In recent times, asbestos lawsuits have become more prevalent. The firm is recognized for its leadership in this area. The firm's founders, Perry Weitz and Arthur Luxenberg have extensive experience in asbestos lawsuits. They have also obtained some of the largest settlements ever seen in mesothelioma litigation history. The firm has a strong New York presence, and one of its first wins was a verdict of $75 million for 36 workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. In this case the jury awarded a brake technician one of the biggest verdicts ever awarded to a single plaintiff. The legal team of Weitz & Luxenberg includes attorneys Venus Burns, Leonard Sandoval and Josiah Parker. They recently secured a $23 million trial verdict for James McWilliams. He is an 81-year old steamfitter who contracted mesothelioma. The verdict awarded him $10 million in future medical expenses and $13 million in compensation for the pain he suffered in the past. The team also secured $23 million in a consolidated trial for five former Jenkins Bros. ship fitters. Judge Joan Madden consolidated the cases to increase pressure on defendants to settle. Chris Panatier Chris Panatier is an experienced trial lawyer who represents victims who have been exposed to toxic substances. His expertise is evident in the over $150 million verdicts that he has won for his clients and in the recognition he has received from his professional peers. Norman asbestos lawyers focuses solely on toxic torts, and he is a specialist in mesothelioma litigation and asbestos litigation. He also has extensive experience in product liability, pharmaceuticals commercial disputes, catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death. Asbestos, a mineral that is toxic, can cause deadly illnesses like mesothelioma. The condition typically arises decades after exposure, and it is difficult to diagnose. Asbestos is exposed in various ways, including mining, manufacturing and home construction. However, the majority of cases involve asbestos exposure in the workplace. The state of California has many places where asbestos was employed in the past, such as factories and shipyards. These sites are usually contaminated with asbestos because of its fire resistance and insulation properties. In addition, contaminated sites could be breeding sites for harmful bacteria and viruses. Asbestos is also present in drinking water and soil. While the majority of asbestos was removed from the environment in the mid-1980s, asbestos-contaminated sites remain a threat to the public's health. The state has strict environmental laws to protect workers and residents. Asbestos lawsuits can be complicated, and it's important to consult a mesothelioma lawyer who is experienced. During closing arguments, Chris Panatier used an analogy from an ice cream parlor to make a connection and communicate his point with jurors in the Johnson & Johnson talc case. The creative method allowed him to win a blockbuster verdict. He represented four plaintiffs who claimed J&J talc was the cause of mesothelioma. The jury awarded $21.7 million to Joanne Anderson and her husband who were exposed asbestos from the baby powder manufactured by the company. The jury awarded $4 million as punitive damages. The family also filed a lawsuit against J&J suppliers, including Imerys SA, Cyprus Amax Minerals which is a division of Brenntag, and Honeywell International. Just a few miles from J&J headquarters the jury delivered its verdict. The jury determined that the company was aware the dangers posed by asbestos in the talc they produced but failed to warn its customers. The plaintiffs' lawyer, Moshe Konigsberg of Levy Konigsberg, in New York, along with associate Christopher Panatier from Simon Greenstone Panatier, in Dallas, argued the company was guilty of “maliciously or willfully disregard” for the safety of plaintiffs.